Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to Journal of Social, Education and Religious Studies (JSERS) undergo a double-blind peer review process, ensuring that:
- The identity of the authors is not disclosed to the reviewers
- The identity of the reviewers is not disclosed to the authors
This process maintains impartiality, fairness, and academic integrity.
1. Initial Editorial Screening
All manuscripts are first reviewed by the editorial team to check:
- Compliance with the journal’s scope and guidelines
- Originality and potential contribution to the field
- Technical completeness and adherence to author guidelines
Manuscripts that do not meet these basic requirements may be desk rejected without external review.
2. Assignment to Reviewers
Manuscripts passing the initial screening are assigned to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
3. Double-Blind Peer Review
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:
- Originality and novelty
- Clarity and coherence of arguments
- Methodological rigor
- Significance and contribution to the discipline
Reviewers provide recommendations:
- Accept
- Accept with minor revisions
- Revise and resubmit (major revisions)
- Reject
4. Editorial Decision
The editorial team considers the reviewers’ reports and makes a final decision:
- Accept
- Revise (minor or major)
- Reject
The decision is communicated to the authors along with anonymized reviewers’ comments.
5. Revision and Resubmission
If revisions are requested:
- Authors must submit a revised manuscript
- Authors are encouraged to include a response letter explaining changes made
The revised manuscript may be sent for a second round of review if necessary.
6. Final Acceptance and Publication
Upon acceptance, manuscripts proceed to copyediting, layout, and publication in the upcoming issue.






