The Potential and Limitations of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Enhancing Conceptual Understanding

Neni Sriwahyuni; Muharleni

Authors

Neni Sriwahyuni STAI YPI Al-Ikhsan Painan Author
Muharleni State University of Padang Author

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, conceptual understanding, immersive learning, educational technology

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has encouraged the integration of Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) as innovative learning tools capable of providing interactive and immersive learning experiences. However, the effectiveness of these technologies in enhancing conceptual understanding remains inconsistent across educational contexts. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the potential and limitations of AR and VR in learning, particularly regarding students’ conceptual understanding. A qualitative approach employing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method was adopted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data were collected from articles indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, ERIC, and Google Scholar published between 2015 and 2025. Following the screening and selection process, 36 eligible articles were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that AR and VR have significant potential to improve the visualization of abstract concepts, learning motivation, student engagement, and exploration-based learning experiences. Nevertheless, their impact on conceptual understanding is not always consistent and is strongly influenced by instructional design quality, pedagogical integration, learner characteristics, as well as infrastructure readiness and teacher competencies. Furthermore, challenges such as cognitive load, implementation costs, and digital access disparities remain significant barriers to the adoption of immersive technologies in education. This study highlights that the effectiveness of AR and VR depends not merely on technological sophistication but also on their integration with appropriate pedagogical strategies. Therefore, the development of more comprehensive AR- and VR-based learning models is necessary to support meaningful and sustainable conceptual understanding.

References

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.

Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Educational Research Review, 20, 1–11.

Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.

Bacca-Acosta, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., & Graf, S. (2022). Trends in augmented reality applications for education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 4513–4536.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn. National Academy Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage Publications.

Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education. eLearning & Software for Education, 1, 133–141.

Garzón, J., et al. (2019). Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459.

Garzón, J., Pavón, J., & Baldiris, S. (2019). Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23(4), 447–459.

Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., & Wilson, C. (2021). Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: A systematic literature review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 1–32.

Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109–123.

Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Computers & Education, 123.

Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). A review of the use of virtual reality head-mounted displays in education. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1515–1529.

Jensen, L., & Konradsen, F. (2018). Education and Information Technologies, 23.

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University.

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). Educational Psychology Review.

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). Immersive virtual reality and learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 1–26.

Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2021). The cognitive affective model of immersive learning. Educational Psychology Review, 33(3), 937–958.

Makransky, G., et al. (2019). Immersive VR and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236.

Makransky, G., et al. (2019). Learning and Instruction, 60.

Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225–236.

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia Learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

OECD. (2023). Digital Education Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Parong, J., & Mayer, R. (2018). Learning science in immersive VR. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797.

Radianti, J., et al. (2020). A systematic review of immersive VR in higher education. Computers & Education, 147.

Radianti, J., et al. (2020). Computers & Education, 147.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and Technology.

Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Enhancing our lives with immersive VR. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3.

Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2016). Frontiers in Robotics and AI.

Suryani, N., et al. (2022). AR and VR in Indonesian education. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55.

Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: Twenty years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31(2), 261–292.

UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in Education.

UNESCO. (2023). Technology in education report.

Wu, H. K., et al. (2020). Computers & Education.

Wu, H. K., et al. (2020). Current status of AR in education. Computers & Education.

Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2023). Current status, opportunities, and challenges of AR and VR in education. Computers & Education, 198, 104789.

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971