Organizational Sabotage: Antecedents, Independent Factors, and Their Implications for Performance Effectiveness

Authors

  • Desvi Emty Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau image/svg+xml Author

Keywords:

organizational sabotage, counterproductive work behavior, organizational justice, ewuh-pakewuh culture, public service performance

Abstract

This study aims to explore the meaning of organizational sabotage within public service bureaucracy, focusing on its antecedent factors, cultural mediators, and implications for performance effectiveness in Kampar Regency, Riau, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative intrinsic case study design oriented toward Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 22 employees from three organizational units: the Investment and One-Stop Integrated Service Agency (DPMPTSP) of Kampar Regency, a telecommunications company, and a private hospital operating within Kampar Regency. Data collection was complemented by 12 weeks of participant observation and organizational document analysis. Reflexive thematic analysis identified four major themes: sabotage as a “silent language” manifested through administrative exclusion and knowledge concealment; relational justice wounds and supervisor ostracism as primary triggers; ewuh-pakewuh norms and the quality of Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) as cultural mediating and moderating mechanisms; and the erosion of service timeliness, team trust, and investment reputation as cumulative yet largely hidden consequences. The findings extend the understanding of sabotage from an individual deviation to a culturally structured meaning-making practice, leading to the development of the concept of “polite sabotage” as a localized form of counterproductive work behavior. This concept integrates Social Exchange Theory, Affective Events Theory, and the Job Demands–Resources Model within a hierarchical collectivist context. The study highlights the importance of interactional justice, strengthening leader–member exchange quality, and culturally grounded emotional regulation training. Future research is recommended to employ longitudinal designs and cross-cultural comparisons to psychometrically validate the construct of polite sabotage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2023). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

Al-Atwi, A. A., Cogswell, J. E., & Liu, C. (2024). "I am sorry, but I did not mean to hurt you": A moderated-mediation model of group non-purposeful ostracism. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(6), 1375–1394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09956-5

Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800

Çivilidağ, A., Durmaz, Ş., & Uslu, B. (2025). Investigating the relationship between organizational cynicism and counterproductive work behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1529798. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1529798

Dai, Y., Li, H., Xie, W., & Deng, T. (2022). Power distance belief and workplace communication: The mediating role of fear of authority. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2932. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052932

Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln's parallel criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous community social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116

Gu, X., Liu, C., Ma, J., & Du, C. (2024). Supervisor ostracism and employees' emotional labor: The moderating effect of interpersonal harmony. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(2), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09891-x

Khan, J., Zhang, Q., Salameh, A. A., & Li, M. (2025). The trickle-down effect of supervisor ostracism on employee knowledge sabotage behavior: A serial mediation model of employee neuroticism and time theft. International Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70090

Kurniawanti, I. A., Zain, D., Thoyib, A., & Rahayu, M. (2023). Knowledge hiding and individual task performance: The role of individual creativity as mediator. Heliyon, 9(11), e21035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21035

Li, Y., He, S., Song, M., & Jeon, J. (2023). Exploring the effects of power distance orientation on unethical pro-organisational behaviour from the perspective of management. South African Journal of Business Management, 54(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v54i1.3437

Mattar, D. M., Haddad, J. J., & Haddad, C. J. (2025). Workplace ostracism and service performance: The mediating role of job tension, organizational identification, and work engagement. Journal of Service Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063070221121506

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.

Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies, 5(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419

Orchidiella, Z., Mulyani, I., & Elida, T. (2023). Perilaku konterproduktif di tempat kerja pada Generasi Z (studi deskriptif). Inovatif: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial, 3(6), 9993–10004.

Pasaribu, R. P., Siahaan, Y. A. S., & Silitonga, R. J. (2024). Perilaku kerja kontraproduktif pegawai negeri sipil. Inovatif: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial, 4(1), 7006–7018. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i1.8697

Perotti, F. A., Belas, J., Jabeen, F., & Bresciani, S. (2023). The influence of motivations to share knowledge in preventing knowledge sabotage occurrences: An empirically tested motivational model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122571

Perotti, F. A., Ferraris, A., Candelo, E., & Busso, D. (2022). The dark side of knowledge sharing: Exploring "knowledge sabotage" and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 141, 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.033

Qi, F.-S., & Ramayah, T. (2022). Defensive silence, defensive voice, knowledge hiding, and counterproductive work behavior through the lens of stimulus-organism-response. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 822008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.822008

Rizvi, U. K., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2024). How organizational politics and workplace ostracism affect counterproductive work behavior in Pakistan: The mediatory role of organizational cynicism complemented by psychological capital. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4959637

Sabir, M. R., Majid, M. B., Aslam, M. Z., Rehman, A., & Rehman, S. (2024). Does workplace ostracism lead to counterproductive work behavior in healthcare employees? The role of transactional and relational psychological contract breach. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2325337. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2325337

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2021). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). Sage.

Song, Y. H., & Park, J. (2022). The relationship between employees' daily customer injustice and customer-directed sabotage: Cross-level moderating effects of emotional stability and mindfulness. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 819396. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.819396

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74. (dirujuk melalui ulasan kontemporer 30 tahun AET, Taylor & Francis Special Issue, 2026)

Zeeshan, M., Batool, N., Raza, M. A., et al. (2024). Workplace ostracism and instigated workplace incivility: A moderated mediation model of narcissism and negative emotions. Public Organization Review, 24, 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-023-00754-w

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

Issue

Section

Articles